Legal Opinion
AFL-CIO v. McLaughlin
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 20, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-1683PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SPORKIN, District Judge.
On this date, in a separate opinion, I enjoined the Department of Labor (“DOL” or “Department”) from implementing the new Adverse Effect Wage Rate regulations it adopted in 1987 (“AEWR Opinion”). Now before me is a related regulation which is intended to provide protection for farmworkers paid on a piece rate basis. 20 C.F.R. Sec. 655.102(b)(9)(ii) (April 1, 1988); 52 Fed.Reg. 20515 (June 1, 1987). 1 Plaintiffs argue that the regulation is “arbitrary, capricious, ... or otherwise contrary to law,” 5 U.S.C. Sec. 706(2)(A) (1982), and have moved to have…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- NAACP v. DonovanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
- NAACP, Jefferson County Branch v. DonovanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- Brae Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Federation Of Labor And Congress Of Industrial Organizations (Afl-Cio) v. Elizabeth H. DoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations v. DoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989