Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Haley

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1881PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Error from Wyandotte District Court. ACTION brought by Wo ten Haley, as administrator of the estate of William Deal, to recover damages sustained by two minor children of the deceased.

Read the full summary

Error from Wyandotte District Court. ACTION brought by Wo ten Haley, as administrator of the estate of William Deal, to recover damages sustained by two minor children of the deceased. Trial at the July Term, 1879, of the district court, when the plaintiff asked the court to instruct the jury as follows: “1st. That the law of this state provides that ‘every railroad company organized or doing business in this state shall be liable for all damages done to any employé of such company, in consequence of any negligence of its agents, or by any mismanagement of its engineers or other employés, to…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

HortoN, C. J.:

This was an action brought by Woten Haley, as administrator, against the ^Missouri Pacific railway company, to recover damages sustained by two minor children of William Deal, deceased. Deal received fatal injuries near Connor’s station, between Wyandotte and Leavenworth, on January 8, 1878, caused by the alleged negligence of one Patrick Kelly, then an engineer and employé of the railway company. It appears from the evidence given on the trial, that at the time the deceased was injured he was also an em-ployé of the company, engaged in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McAunich v. Mississippi & Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  2. Bemis v. BeckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1862
  3. Chicago & Northeastern Railroad v. SturgisMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Ditberner v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Hunt v. Chicago & N. W. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1868

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Bedford Quarries Co. v. BoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Lavallee v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Jacobs v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Callahan v. St. Louis Merchants' Bridge Terminal RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API