Legal Opinion

Mixon v. Chrysler Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 16, 1984No. 83-221PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

On April 8,1983, the trial court entered an order granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment. The trial court found that there was no genuine issue of any material fact and also found that answers to appellants’ outstanding interrogatories to appellee Chrysler could have no bearing on the motion for summary judgment.

For their appeal the appellants argue that there was a genuine issue of fact and that the court erred in denying appellants’ motion to compel discovery. We do not agree with appellants on either argument.

On December 19, 1977, Carlton Mixon was driving…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Talley v. MFA Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Leigh Winham, Inc. v. Reynolds Insurance AgencySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Southern Co., Inc. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. FishSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  5. Cockman v. Welder's Supply Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Higgins v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Harrison v. Bill Cairns Pontiac of Marlow Heights, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Morris v. CullipherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Yielding v. Chrysler Motor Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. First National Bank v. Newport Hospital & Clinic, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API