Legal Opinion

Valdes v. Ruas

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 14, 1978No. 76-1977PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellants, plaintiffs below, bring this appeal from an order dated September 30, 1976, dismissing their complaint with prejudice pursuant to appellees’, defendants below, amended motion to dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Appellant Fernando Valdes was involved in an automobile accident with appellee Ernesto Rúas. As a result of that accident, Valdes sued Rúas and his insurer for personal injuries sustained in the accident. After a jury trial, a verdict was returned in which it was found that Valdes had not sustained a permanent injury or incurred medical…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Malone v. MeresSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. Bohlinger v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  3. Calhoun v. New Hampshire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1978
  4. Wooten v. CollinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. CalhounDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Amey, Inc., and John C. Amis, Jr. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc., Amey, Inc., and John C. Amis, Jr. v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Heney v. Windsor Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1991
  3. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc. v. Annette CormierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  4. In re International Oil Trading Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2016
  5. Latreille v. Chicago Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API