Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Halley v. Nashua River Paper Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 21, 1909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

This is an action for personal injuries in which a verdict was ordered for the defendant. The case is here on an exception to that order.

The jury were warranted in finding that the plaintiff, a minor seventeen years of age, went to work in the defendant’s paper mill on July 18, 1907. The accident happened on the fifteenth day of the following August, — three weeks and three days after he went to work. The plaintiff was third hand on one of three paper machines one hundred and fifty feet long. Pulp is run into the wet end of this machine, and paper comes out of the other end of it. Three men…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burke v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  2. De Costa v. Hargraves MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  3. Byrne v. LearnardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  4. Joyce v. American Writing Paper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  5. Manning v. Excelsior Laundry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Glass v. Hazen Confectionery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Cote v. D. W. Pingree Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Donovan v. Chase-Shawmut Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  4. Moloney v. Pemberton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Curren v. Magee Furnace Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API