Legal Opinion

People v. Dawson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 16, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment *818unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly determined that defendant lacks standing to challenge the strip search of codefendant and the seizure of cocaine from codefendant’s underwear. “A defendant seeking to challenge a search and seizure cannot rest upon the fact that the People have charged him with constructive possession of contraband, but must demonstrate that the search violated a personal legitimate expectation of privacy” (People v Cedeno, 193 AD2d 540, 541, lv denied 82 NY2d 715, citing People v Wesley, 73 NY2d 351, 357-359). Defendant made no such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. WesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. TejadaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. CedenoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. People v. AndrewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. People v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. HogueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. People v. VaccaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. HOGUE, GERALD E., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. People v. HogueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API