Legal Opinion

Nutter v. Woodard

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 16, 1993No. 92-P-126PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.

According to the nullity doctrine, as set forth in Chandler v. Dunlop, 311 Mass. 1, 5 (1942), a complaint brought against a deceased person is one “brought against nobody,” and, because such an action is void from the beginning, any subsequent amendment of the complaint does not relate back, for purposes of the statute of limitations, to the date of the initial filing. The issue before us is whether the instant case is governed by the nullity doctrine or, instead, by the reasoning in Holmquist v. Starr, 402 Mass. 92 (1988), which narrowed that doctrine.

On September 4, 1986, Monica M. Nutter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chandler v. DunlopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Bengar v. Clark Equipment Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. Holmquist v. StarrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Touzin v. SmithMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pierce v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. White v. HelmuthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  3. Labor v. Sun Hill Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  4. Cross v. HewittMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  5. Amidon v. ReidMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API