Commercial Casualty Ins. v. Knutsen Motor Trucking Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
VICKERY, PJ.
The errors alleged are: First, that the Knutsen Company had concurrent insurance with the Travelers Insurance Company and that by virtue of a contract between them that it was to look to each company for the amount in proportion to the insurance of each company, to the judgment that was rendered against it, and that the Travelers Insurance Company was liable to it, if anybody was, for the amount sued for in this action, and that the Knutsen Company had no right or claim against the Commercial Casualty Insurance Company and that the judgment, therefore, rendered in the Common Pleas…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Wilks v. Allstate Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Clow v. National Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Fireman'S Fund Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. American Centennial Insurance Co.Lucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1995
- Lincoln Electric Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.