Legal Opinion

State v. Cupp

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 2018No. Nos. 2017-1547; 2017-1701PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO'Donnell, J.

*208{¶ 1} We accepted a certified conflict in this case and agreed to resolve the following question:

"[Is] a defendant entitled to jail time credit for presentence detention time when held on a bond if, during the same period of time, he is serving a sentence on an unrelated case?"

151 Ohio St.3d 1525, 2018-Ohio-557, 91 N.E.3d 756, quoting the court of appeals' December 1, 2017 entry.

{¶ 2} We also accepted the state's discretionary appeal, which sets forth the following proposition of law:

A defendant is not entitled to jail credit for pre-sentence detention time when held on bond on a case if,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dove v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Franchise Developers, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State Ex Rel. Richardson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Makley v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. In re N.M.P. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. CorpeningOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State v. SteinmetzOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. BryantOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State v. HogyaOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API