State v. Cupp
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO'Donnell, J.
*208{¶ 1} We accepted a certified conflict in this case and agreed to resolve the following question:
"[Is] a defendant entitled to jail time credit for presentence detention time when held on a bond if, during the same period of time, he is serving a sentence on an unrelated case?"
151 Ohio St.3d 1525, 2018-Ohio-557, 91 N.E.3d 756, quoting the court of appeals' December 1, 2017 entry.
{¶ 2} We also accepted the state's discretionary appeal, which sets forth the following proposition of law:
A defendant is not entitled to jail credit for pre-sentence detention time when held on bond on a case if,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dove v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Franchise Developers, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Richardson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Makley v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- In re N.M.P. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. CorpeningOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. SteinmetzOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. BryantOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. HogyaOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.