Legal Opinion

Estate of Johnson v. Carr

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 31, 1986No. 85-285PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

This appeal calls for an interpretation of a contract for the sale of land between L. W. and Carutha Johnson, appellants, and Clarence and Rosie Carr, appellees. The contract was made in 1966 and provided that:

for an additional ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration, . . . the sellers shall have the option to repurchase the real property involved in this contract in the event purchasers decide to sell ... in the event the purchasers desire to sell. . . they shall give the sellers written notice of their desire to sell and sellers shall have sixty days from…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Turner v. ShirkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  2. Estate of Johnson v. CarrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. New Haven Trap Rock Co. v. TataSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  4. Long v. WaybleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Riverside Surgery Center, LLC v. Methodist Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  2. McCord v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  3. Cottrell v. BeardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Riverside Surgery Center, LLC. v. Methodist Health Systems Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API