Legal Opinion

Brando v. Chater

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided May 23, 1997No. Civil No. 95-3266Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WOLIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Antonio Brando (“Brando”) brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (1996) for review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying Brando’s application for disability insurance benefits. Brando alleges that Administrative Law Judge “ALJ” Frederick Harap’s (“Harap”) decision was not supported by substantial evidence. At issue are the date of the expiration of coverage and the date of the onset of the disability. ALJ Harap concluded that Brando’s insured status expired on December 31, 1990…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Rachel R. Blalock v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  5. Leo R. Smith v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API