Valdovinos v. Cushman & Wakefield U.S., Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CECILIA VALDOVINOS, Case No. 21-cv-01924-JCS 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 42 10 CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD U.S., INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Defendants Cushman & Wakefield U.S., Inc. (“C&W”) and Kevin O’Hair move for 15 summary judgment on Plaintiff Cecilia Valdovinos’s claims in this employment discrimination 16 case. The Court finds the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the 17 motion hearing previously set for May 13, 2022.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.