Legal Opinion
American Continental Insurance v. PHICO Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided March 2, 1999No. COA98-728Published
1Opinion of the Court
512 S.E.2d 490 (1999)
AMERICAN CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,
v.
PHICO INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.
No. COA98-728.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
March 2, 1999.
Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan, L.L.P., by Michael E. Weddington and James Y. Kerr, II, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant, cross-appellee.
Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P., by Richard T. Boyette and Kari Russwurm Johnson, Raleigh, for defendant-appellee, cross-appellant.
EDMUNDS, Judge.
Defendant PHICO Insurance Company (PHICO) provided professional…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Great American Insurance v. C. G. Tate Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. MabeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Jamestown Mut. Ins. Co. v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Great American Insurance v. C. G. Tate Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. MabeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.