Jaikins v. Jaikins
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The question presented is whether the trial court erred in refusing to modify a judgment of divorce hy terminating alimony. We hold that there was no error.
The sequence of events immediately preceding this appeal is as follows: the defendant sought modification of the judgment in a number of respects. She also sought an order holding the plaintiff in contempt. The plaintiff opposed the defendant’s request and as affirmative relief sought a termination of alimony. On August 19, 1970, a hearing was held in the Oakland County Circuit Court. The circuit court disposed of a number of issues at…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ashburn v. AshburnMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
3Cited by1 opinion
- Moffat v. MoffatMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981