Phaul v. Macon Railway & Light Co.

1. When considered in the light of the pleadings, the facts of the case, the entire charge, and the qualifying note of the judge to certain grounds of the amendment to the motion for new trial, no error *172requiring tlie grant of a new trial is shown in any of the grounds which complain of errors made by the judge in charging the jury.

Decided January 25, 1921. Action for damages; from city court of Macon — Judge Guerry. May 20, 1920. -Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court. Harris, Harris & Wiiman, J. E. Hall, for plaintiff. Ellis & Glawson, for defendant.

2. While the brief…