Legal Opinion
Manchester Housing Authority v. Fisk
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 3, 1959No. 4800PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
The defendants’ motions to dismiss present the issue of whether the procedure established by the controlling statutes is so indefinite and arbitrary as to deprive the defendants of their properties without due process of law, in violation of the Constitution. N. H. Const., Pt. I, Arts. 12th, 15th. See Opinion of the Justices, 66 N. H. 629, 633.
The pertinent statutory provisions are contained in RSA 203:12, since the act relating to “Redevelopment Projects” (RSA ch. 205) confers upon the plaintiff “all the rights, powers, privileges and immunities that such authority has under the housing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Backus v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Bailey v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Lone Star Gas Co. v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- LeClair v. WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
3Cited by5 opinions
- Port of New York Authority v. HemingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Wilton-Lyndeboro Cooperative School District v. GreggSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
- Dover Housing Authority v. FeeneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Port of New York Authority v. HemingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Port of New York Authority v. HemingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961