Legal Opinion

Hinds v. Miller

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1876Published

Error to the Circuit Court of Washington County. Hon. C. C. Shackleford, Judge. The opinion of the court contains all the'material facts in •the case, together with the assignment of errors.

1Opinion of the Court

Tarbell, J.,

delivered the opiuion-of the court.

This is a proceeding commenced by attachment in the county ■of Washington, in 1866, on a note falling due in April, 1862. •John A. Miller, plaintiff; Foley, Avery & Co., defendants; Thomas Hinds and Howell Hinds, garnishees.

Foley, Avery & Co. were non-residents, service of process •upon them b"eing by publication. Judgments were obtained against the defendants and garnishees. Howell Hinds died, -and his widow and heirs were proceeded against’by publication. Writ of error by the widow. The proceedings throughout are ■critically assailed, and,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Foster v. SimmonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Hughes v. WilkinsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1855

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API