Legal Opinion

Martin v. Schindley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 2, 1994No. S93G1960PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hunstein, Justice.

Susan Martin and Alan Schindley, formerly wife and husband, are the record owners of certain real property. The parties’ settlement agreement, incorporated in the divorce decree, divided their equity in the property and further provided that

[t]wo years from the date this Agreement is signed [May 5, 1989] . . ., [Schindley] shall have the option to buy [Martin’s] interest [in the property] for the sum of $8,066.10. Exercise of said option should be by notice to [Martin] . . . within 60 days of the date the option period begins ....

On July 2, 1991, Schindley filed a petition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Redmond v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  2. Reeve v. HicksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Anthony v. AusburnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  4. Martin v. SchindleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Historic MacOn Station Ltd. Partnership v. Piedmont-Forrest Corp. (In Re Historic MacOn Station Ltd. Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 1993

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  2. Pargar, LLC v. CP Summit Retail, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Wieland v. WielandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. Davis v. Vcp South, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  5. A & D Asphalt Co. v. Carroll & Carroll of Macon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API