Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Flournoy

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 18, 1925PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

Lee Flournoy, the petitioner invokes relief under the Habeas Corpus- Act, and alleges that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty by the sheriff and jailer of Greene County, Missouri, under and by virtue of a warrant of extradition issued, after a hearing, by the Governor of this State, upon an application of the Governor of Nebraska for the return of said Lee Flournoy to said State to answer a charge of bank robbery.

I. There is no return filed herein by the officer having the custody of the petitioner, other than a declaration endorsed on the back of the writ issued to the sheriff by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ReggelSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Drew v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Ex parte MorganDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1883
  4. McConologue's caseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. State ex rel. Arnold v. JustusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BassSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. State Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. SkinkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Kimbro v. StarrSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. State Ex Rel. Chase v. CalvirdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  5. State Ex Rel. Gaines v. WesthuesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API