Brady Overseers v. Clinton Overseers
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 11, Jan. T., 1892, by defendants, from decree of Q. S. Lycoming Co., March Sess. 1891, No. 23, affirming order of removal. Appeal from order of removal of a pauper.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 11, Jan. T., 1892, by defendants, from decree of Q. S. Lycoming Co., March Sess. 1891, No. 23, affirming order of removal. Appeal from order of removal of a pauper. The facts appear by the opinion of the court below, Ikeler, P. J., of the Twenty-sixth judicial district specially presiding, which was, in part, as follows: “ Appeal by the township of Clinton from an order of removal issued by two justices at the instance of the overseers of the poor of Brady township at the request of Jefferson Shaffer, a pauper, by an order of relief, adjudging him a pauper, and his settlement in…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
An examination of the twenty-three specifications fads to disclose any serious error. We do not think their discussion would add anything to the value or interest of our legal literature.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Fuller v. ColeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Noxen Township Poor Dist. v. Monroe Township Poor Dist.Wyoming County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1921