Nordquist v. the Amourdale State Bk.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
* [EDITORS' NOTE: FOOTNOTE * IS OMITTED FROM THE ORIGINAL COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT, THEREFORE IT IS NOT DISPLAYED IN THE ONLINE VERSION.]
1. — Appeal and Error. Omission from bill of exceptions of evidence submitted in original trial, as required by Rule 14 of Kansas City Court of Appeals, upon which judgment sought to be set aside was based, together with defendant's motion to strike motion of plaintiff, held not error, purpose of motion by plaintiff being to set aside judgment as prematurely rendered before term to which case had been continued and not to appeal from it on its merits.
2. — Same.…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State ex rel. Potter v. RileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Cross v. GouldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
- Lawyers' Co-Operative Publishing Co. v. GordonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- Adderton v. CollierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
- Pittsburg Plate Glass Co. v. PeperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Pioneer Cooperage Co. v. Bland and Foster.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1934
- Smith v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re the Marriage of EdenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981