Doyle v. Wiley
Illinois Supreme Court
It appears that the second bill filed in this case was a tr*>v script of the first bill as amended, except that the oatJw ui the defendants to their answers were waived. The op' non gives a statement of the facts. ---- The decree in this case was entered by order of Peters, Judge, at May term, 1854, of the Peoria Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtCaton, J.
As we think, the most important and the most difficult question in this case is, as to the admissibility of the depositions taken in the former suit, and without which this bill cannot be sustained. The depositions were taken in a former suit between the same parties, and involving the same subject-matter which is set up in this bill. But the depositions were taken before any issue was formed, or even any answer was filed in that suit, although upon regular notice to the defendants. After the depositions were taken an answer was filed, and subsequently the bill was amended, and then dismissed…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Galowich v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Harding v. American Glucose Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1899
- McInturff v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Schmidt v. CooperIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. MasonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.