Legal Opinion

People v. Mulero

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2014Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph A. Zayas, J.

Defendant moves for an order dismissing the indictment on the ground that he was denied the right to testify before the grand jury (see CPL 190.50 [5] [c]). Defendant contends that dismissal of the indictment is warranted because the Department of Correction failed to produce him in court on the day he was scheduled to testify. The People oppose defendant’s motion in its entirety. A hearing was ordered on defendant’s claim to resolve the factual disputes raised by defendant’s motion regarding the reason for defendant’s nonproduction.

In People v Evans (79…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. SawyerNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. People v. SawyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. People v. WatkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API