Legal Opinion

State v. Reu-El

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 26, 2017No. 113799Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 113,799 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. KING PHILLIP AMMAN REU-EL, f/k/a PHILLIP CHEATHAM, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A district court has discretion under K.S.A. 2016 Supp. 22-3210(d)(1) to grant a motion to withdraw a guilty or no contest plea for good cause. Accordingly, appellate courts review a district court's decision to deny a presentence motion to withdraw a plea, including the underlying conclusion that the defendant has not established good cause, for an abuse of discretion. This generally means that the district court's…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API