Legal Opinion

People v. Campanella

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 1940No. Crim. 2123PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The district attorney filed an information against the defendant charging him with murder. The defendant entered a plea of not guilty. The action was tried before the trial court sitting with a jury. The district attorney conceded that the evidence did not disclose the crime of murder in the first degree, but contended it did disclose murder in the second degree. The jury returned a verdict in accordance with that contention. The defendant made a motion for a new trial which was denied. He has appealed from the judgment and from said order.

The defendant was living at 363 Page Street in San…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. People v. ElmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. People v. OroscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. People v. CastroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. People v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Pueblo v. González RománSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1992
  3. Pueblo v. de Jesús SantanaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1972
  4. People v. GarnierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. People v. CampanellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API