Legal Opinion

Harper v. Tri-State Motors, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1937No. 5473Published

1Per curiam

In due time after the filing of the opinion in this case, the respondent Ira C. Holbrook filed a petition for a rehearing. In the opinion previously filed herein, 90 Utah 212, 58 P. (2d) 18, this court held thatthere is sufficient evidence in the record, if the trial court believed it, to support a finding that Holbrook took no part either directly or indirectly in the sale of the stock to Harper. But the order nevertheless is that the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial as to all of the defendants and respondents, including Holbrook. In the petition Holbrook calls our…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harper v. Tri-State Motors, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API