Legal Opinion

Atlas Trading Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 15, 1953No. Reap. Dec. 8243; Entry Nos. 8154; 9594PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eicwall, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement, consolidated at the trial, involve wool hooked rugs exported from China on March 20, 1940, and May 15, 1940, respectively.

The values pertaining to the merchandise in reappraisement No. 137197-A are as follows:

Invoiced U. S. dollars per sq. ft. Entered Tientsin yuan dollars per sq. ft. Appraised U. S. dollars per sq. ft.

“Belmont” quality $0. 27 Y $1. 66 $0. 27

“Beverly” quality $0.28 Y $1. 72% $0. 28 less 12.99% for nondutiable charges

The values pertaining to the merchandise in reappraisement No. 137805-Á are as follows:

Entered Invoiced (under…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Gothic Watch Co.United States Customs Court · 1949
  2. United States v. International Commercial Co.United States Customs Court · 1952
  3. Sternfeld v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  4. United States v. Tadross & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  5. Atlas Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Continental Fwdg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Atlas Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  3. Atlas Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API