Legal Opinion
Muse v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided March 31, 1923No. 7280PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
offense is pandering; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of ten years.
The phase of the statute upon which the prosecution is founded is that which uses these words:
“Any person who shall, by promises, threats, violence or by any device or scheme, cause, induce, persuade or encourage an inmate of a house of prostitution to remain therein as such inmate, . . . shall be guilty of pandering, etc.” (Art. 506a, Penal Code.)
Jeannie Coker, nineteen years of age, had been married but was divorced. She arrived in Wellington, Texas, about the middle…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
3Cited by5 opinions
- Porter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Kelley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Newton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Threlkeld v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Wells v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928