Legal Opinion

Woody v. Woody

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 29, 1991No. 90-2837Published

1Per curiam

Appellant has taken a timely appeal from a final order of dissolution of marriage. After filing of the initial brief, however, appellee moved this court for a remand, conceding that the order on appeal did not have sufficient findings of fact to withstand appellate review. See Kim v. Bradshaw, 569 So.2d 532 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Raehn v. Raehn, 557 So.2d 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Appellant has not timely responded to the motion and accordingly we reverse and remand the order here on appeal for entry of an amended final judgment setting forth findings of fact. Either or both parties may, of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kim v. BradshawDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Raehn v. RaehnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API