Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Land Drilling Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided December 1, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-K-895Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, District Judge.
Before me is the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on their third and fifth claims for relief. Also before me is defendants Pate, Pate, McKinney and Grove’s motion to dismiss the ninth claim for relief. For the reasons expressed in my opinion of June 8, 1983, Brooks v. Land Drilling Co., 564 F.Supp. 1518 (D.Colo.1983), I grant the defendants’ motion to dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, I deny the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.
Factual Background
Land Drilling Company, now bankrupt and formerly known as Continental Drilling…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,887 Sundstrand Corporation v. Sun Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,213 Hill York Corporation v. American International Franchises, Inc., Gurn H. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,548 Radiation Dynamics, Inc. v. Lawrence GoldmuntzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,722 Securities and Exchange Commission v. The Seaboard Corporation, Etc., Admiralty Fund and Admiralty Fund Growth Series Litigation Trust, Cross-Claimant/appellant v. Hugh Johnson & Company, Inc., Hugh Johnson, Norman Michael Keiser, and Ernst& Ernst, Cross-Defendants/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.