Legal Opinion

Workman v. District Court

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 29, 1936No. 43318PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.

The question raised under this writ is whether or not the district court of Delaware county had the jurisdiction to make the order hereinafter referred to vacating the judgment and reinstating the case.

The original action involved herein was entitled Iletha Sehlumbohm v. the petitioners in this action, and was bottomed on an alleged injury to the plaintiff growing out of an automobile accident. To a full understanding* of the question involved herein the following chronology is necessary.

On the 16th day of November, 1932, a petition was filed in the Delaware county district court as above…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McKinney v. McClureSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  2. Great Western Accident Insurance v. MartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  3. Hansen v. McCoy & McCoySupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  4. McCoy v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Windus v. Great Plains GasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  2. State Ex Rel. Weede v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co. of DelawareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  3. Concannon v. BlackmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  4. Dan Dugan Transport Co. v. Worth CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. Ervin v. TriplettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API