Commonwealth v. Chattanooga Im'p. & M'f'g. Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 74. — ACTION BY THE COMMONWEALTH AGAINST CHATTANOOGA IMPLEMENT & MFG. CO TO RECOVER A PENALTY. — Appeal from Carlisle Circuit Court. R. J. Bugg, Circuit Judge. Prom a judgment dismissing the petition the Commonwealth appeals —
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Hobson
Affirming.
The Chattanooga Implement & Manufacturing Company is a corporation formed under the laws of Tennessee and residing at Knoxville. It did not comply with section 571, Ky. St. 1903, requiring all *637foreign corporations “carrying on any business in this State” to have an authorized agent here upon whom process may be served and to file certain notices with the Secretary of State. On October 24, 1906, the Commonwealth filed a petition against the company to recover the penalty provided for the violation of that section. The defendant filed an answer. The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Louisville & N. R. R. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
3Cited by7 opinions
- Larkin Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- E. C. Artman Lumber Co. v. BogardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Creamery Package Manufacturing Co. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1946
- Borderland Coal Sales Company v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Snowden v. Masonic L. Ass'n of West. N.Y.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.