Legal Opinion

Dunham v. Baxter

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 15, 1808PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Assumpsit for money had and received, money laid out and expended, and money ¡ent and accommodated.

1Opinion of the Court

Upon trial before Parker, J., at the last November term in this county, the facts proved by the plaintiff were, that Baxter, being a young man acting as clerk in the store of the plaintiffs, engaged in an adventure to the southward with one Baynes; that the defendant purchased parcels of goods of the witnesses upon credit, and sent the goods to Norfolk by Baynes. When called on for payment, Baxter stated that Baynes had not returned, and that h.e had not funds to pay. On the return of Baynes, he exhibited a bill of exchange, purporting to be drawn by Edward Swarbreck, in Savannah, on Thomas…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dodge v. GaylordIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Cutler v. HurlbutWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. West v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1839
  4. Fearing v. De WolfU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1847
  5. Mixer v. DalrympleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API