Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gilbert Dreyfuss v. Timothy Cory

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 12, 2015No. 13-15432Published

1ConcurrenceWallace, Circuit Judge

I concur in the opinion because I agree that the trustee did not follow section 503(b)’s requirement that the payment be made only “after notice and a hearing.” The trustee does not argue that notice was somehow “[injappropriate in the[se] particular circumstances.” 11 U.S.C. § 102(1)(A). I write separately, however, to highlight for the court on remand my concerns about the timeliness of Drey-fuss’s objection.

The thrust of Dreyfuss’s argument over the course of this litigation has been that the trustee paid the wrong amount of taxes. The majority opinion, however, focuses instead on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Margaret Spaulding, and James Bush, Intervenors-Appellants v. University of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API