Legal Opinion

Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided June 13, 1989No. CIV-88-1733-WPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LEE R. WEST, District Judge.

In the action before this Court, the Plaintiffs seek declaratory and permanent in-junctive relief to enjoin the Defendants, Oklahoma Corporation Commission and its Commissioners, from invoking the notice and protest provisions of 52 O.S. § 87.2 for the purpose of conducting increased density proceedings. Plaintiffs are operators of natural gas pipelines and are purchasers under numerous gas contracts entered into with various producer-sellers in Oklahoma. Under the terms of such contracts, plaintiffs purchased natural gas produced from certain wells, most of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Omnia Commercial Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Williams Petroleum Company, a Partnership Composed of William H. Clement and H. C. Preston, Jr. v. Midland Cooperatives, Incorporated, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API