Camden v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARYK. HOFF, Judge.
Catherine Camden (Claimant) appeals from the judgment entered after the grant of summary judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Insurer) in Claimant’s class action 1 to determine whether Insurer was required, under the terms of its automobile insurance policy (policy), to cover inherent diminished value in damaged vehicles otherwise covered under the policy. We affirm.
The undisputed record discloses the following: Insurer issued policy to Claimant, which contains the following relevant provisions:
SECTION IV — PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE
Loss —…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Krombach v. Mayflower Ins. Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Peters v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Gulf Insurance Co. v. Noble BroadcastSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Groves v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchaeferTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Siegle v. Progressive Consumers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Culhane v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Lupo v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Pritchett v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.