Legal Opinion

Merlo v. Orland Hills Police Pension Board

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 4, 2008No. 1-06-3729PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cunningham

The petitioner, Michael Merlo, filed a complaint in the circuit court of Cook County against the respondent, Orland Hills Police Pension Board, for administrative review of the respondent’s decision to deny him a line-of-duty pension. The trial court reversed the respondent’s decision and awarded the petitioner a line-of-duty pension for injuries he sustained while on patrol. On appeal, the respondent argues that the trial court’s findings are against the manifest weight of the evidence. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court.

BACKGROUND

The petitioner has been…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. City of Belvidere v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. AFM Messenger Service, Inc. v. Department of Employment SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Carpetland U.S.A., Inc. v. Illinois Department of Employment SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Robbins v. Board of Trustees of the Carbondale Police Pension FundIllinois Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jones v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  2. Rose v. Board of Trustees of the Mount Prospect Police Pension FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  3. Filskov v. Board of Trustees of the Northlake Police Pension FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. Mingus v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund of PeoriaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  5. Summers v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annunity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API