Fiallo Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. Bell
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Mr. Justice Marshall,
with whom Mr. Justice Brennan joins, dissenting.
Until today I thought it clear that when Congress grants benefits to some citizens, but not to others, it is our duty to insure that the decision comports with Fifth Amendment principles of due process and equal protection. Today, however, the Court appears to hold that discrimination among citizens, however invidious and irrational, must be tolerated if it occurs in the context of the immigration laws. Since I cannot agree that Congress has license to deny fundamental rights to citizens according to the most disfavored…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.