Legal Opinion
Gault v. City of Battle Creek
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided July 12, 1999No. 4:99-cv-00062PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Pastor Mary Gault (“Gault”) and Robert C. Mitchell, III (“Mitchell”), have sued Defendants City of Battle Creek (“Battle Creek”) and Ted Dearing, mayor of the City of Battle Creek (“Dearing”), for violation of their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and for violation of the Michigan Open Meetings Act (“OMA”), 15 M.C.L. §§ 15.261 to .275. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction
Facts
Gault and Mitchell are members of a community organization called FAME, which is dedicated to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dion R. McPherson v. Michigan High School Athletic Association, Inc., Board of Education of the Public Schools of the City of Ann ArborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Booth Newspapers, Inc v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Sandison v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jocham v. Tuscola CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Shields v. Charter Tp. of ComstockDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Jocham v. Tuscola CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003