Legal Opinion

Jordan v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 29, 2002No. A01A1708PublishedCited by 152 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Judge.

James Jordan, proceeding pro se, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence based on newly dis covered evidence and ineffective assistance of counsel. Finding no error to review within the jurisdiction of this court, we dismiss.

This appeal marks the third time this case has come before this court. The facts are set forth in Jordan’s first appeal in which we upheld his convictions. See Graham v. State, 171 Ga. App. 242 (319 SE2d 484) (1984) (“Jordan F). In his second appeal, Jordan appealed the denial of his motion to correct a void…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Echols v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Crumbley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  4. Graham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. Daniels v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by152 opinions

  1. Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Ray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. LOVELESS v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  5. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API