Taylor v. Bliley
Supreme Court of Georgia
Partnership. Injunction and receiver. Before Judge Marshall J. Clarice. Pulton superior court. September term (September 6), 1890. Taylor, on August 16, 1890, by his petition made these allegations : On January 22, 1890, he and Bliley entered into a written agreement attached.
Read the full summary
Partnership. Injunction and receiver. Before Judge Marshall J. Clarice. Pulton superior court. September term (September 6), 1890. Taylor, on August 16, 1890, by his petition made these allegations : On January 22, 1890, he and Bliley entered into a written agreement attached. Bliley had been in the business of an undertake!’, and had an outfit used in carrying on the business, which he valued at $2,594.80. He contracted to sell to petitioner a half-interest in this property for $1,267.45, the title to remain in Bliley until the purchase money was paid. Petitioner paid in cash $600, and gave…
1Opinion of the Court
Simmons, Justice.
The facts will be found in the'official report. Under these facts, we think the trial judge erred in refusing an injunction for the reasons set out in his judgment. That judgment is based upon the idea that the title to the property described in the contract was in the defendant, and that the plaintiff, therefore, was not entitled to an injunction or the appointment of a receiver. We differ from the learned judge upon this question. Under the facts, we think that the plaintiff had sufficient *163interest in the property to authorize him to file the bill and have an injunction and…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Bennett v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Wester v. EverettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920