Legal Opinion

Holloway v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 2008No. COA07-930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Plaintiff Marty Holloway appeals from an opinion and award of the Full Commission denying his claim for workers’ compensation benefits. Plaintiff primarily argues on appeal that the Commission erred in not imposing sanctions on defendant Tyson Foods, Inc. for spoliation of evidence, including granting a presumption of compensability and monetary sanctions. Under controlling precedent, however, the spoliation of evidence gives rise to a permissive adverse inference and not a presumption. Moreover, the principle of spoliation of evidence as applied in North Carolina has evidentiary…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Young v. Hickory Business FurnitureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Koufman v. KoufmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Blinzler v. Marriott International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Aspen Specialty Ins. Co. v. Nucor Corp.North Carolina Business Court · 2025
  2. Dunhill HoldingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  3. Dunhill HoldingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  4. Dunhill Holdings v. Tisha LindbergCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  5. Holloway v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API