Legal Opinion

Clinebell v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1906No. 14,484PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Custer county: Bruno O. Hostetler, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Oldham, C.

This is an action for personal injuries, and is here for a second review by this court. At the first hearing a judgment in favor of the plaintiff was reversed because plaintiff’s petition failed to allege any negligent act on the part of the defendant which was the proximate cause of the injuries. The opinion is reported in 5 Neb. (Unof.) ■603. After the reversal of the judgment an amended petition was filed and issues joined, and on a trial to the court and jury plaintiff again secured a verdict and judgment, from which defendant appeals.

The only alleged error called to our…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hendricks v. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Watson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Wheeler v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API