Legal Opinion
Energy Automation Systems, Inc. v. Saxton
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided March 25, 2009No. 3:08-00285PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Energy Automation Systems, Inc., (“EASI”), Joseph Merlo and Paul Bleiweis, Tennessee citizens, filed this action under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. and the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125 against the Defendants: Paul Saxton and Enercon, Inc., doing business as Enercon International Inc. and Enercon Technologies, Inc. (“Enercon”), citizens of South Dakota. Plaintiffs’ claims arise from their dealership agreement with the Defendants that the Defendants’ can-celled and thereafter, allegedly copied and used Plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. NV Sumatra Tobacco Trading CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. U.S. Gas & Electric, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. v. Medical University HospitalDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021
- Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of GreensburgDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- HLFIP Holding, Inc. v. Rutherford County, TennesseeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.