Legal Opinion

Young v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 18, 2010No. 5D08-4111PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Jermaine Young (defendant) appeals his sentences, arguing that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive Prison Re-leasee Re-Offender (PRR) sentences on his five aggravated assault convictions because all of the crimes occurred during the course of a single criminal episode. We find no error and affirm.

Because we agree with the well reasoned holding set forth by the trial court in its order denying the defendant’s motion to correct sentencing error, we include it here and adopt it as our own. The trial court’s order reads, in pertinent part, as follows:

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CORRECT…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Reeves v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  3. Durr v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. Reeves v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  5. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Florida v. Frank A. MosleySupreme Court of Florida · 2014
  2. Larry Claycomb v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. Mosley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. Tarelo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API