Legal Opinion
Piland v. Eidson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 18, 1973No. 71-2853PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEHER, District Judge:
On September 15, 1971, appellant, while stationed at a Navy Facility, Mare Island, California, submitted his application for discharge from the Naval Service as a conscientious objector. Pursuant to Navy regulations administrative proceedings to determine the validity of appellant’s request were initiated. On October 14, 1971, the Chief of Naval Personnel issued orders directing appellant’s detachment from duty at Mare Island, within the Eastern District of California, and ordering him when detached to report for duty at Naval Station, Adak, Alaska.
Alleging that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Strait v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States of America Ex Rel. Arthur Rudick v. Melvin Laird, Secretary of Defense, and Stanley Resor, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Jarrett v. ResorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Feliciano v. LairdCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Woods v. SheehanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Woods v. SheehanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Piland v. EidsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Sholars v. MatterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Sholars v. MatterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974