Legal Opinion

Flater v. Fey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1888PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Sherwood, 0. J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover damages of the defendants for personal injuries received by falling into a ditch dug by the defendant Fey across a sidewalk in front of his premises in the city of Detroit, and left in an unguarded and dangerous condition. No question is made upon the pleadings. The cause was tried in the Wayne cir*645cuit court, and the circuit judge directed a verdict for the defendants. The plaintiff brings error.

From the record it appears that about five days before the plaintiff received his injury the city gave the defendant Fey a written notice to repair his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Cook v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mollica v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Iamurri v. Saginaw City Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Holmes v. MersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Blickley v. Luce's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Deneen v. Houghton County Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API