United States v. Lindquist
District Court, W.D. Washington
Criminal prosecution by the United States against Verner Lindquist and Harvey Goffee. On motions by defendants in arrest of judgment and for new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
[1] The defendants severally move for new trial and in arrest of judgment — the defendant Goffee because an alleged confession was admitted before the corpus delicti was established; the defendant Lindquist because of the admission of testimony with relation to another offense, which had not been judicially determined. Myer, the storekeeper- of. the Duthie Shipyard, testified that whisky was delivered at the company’s store on three occasions by Lindquist: March 18, 120 bottles; count 2, April 24, 168 bottles; count 3, June 8, 60 bottles. The gatekeeper saw Goffee…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. . FabianNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Daeche v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- State v. FindlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Commonwealth v. McDermottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Commonwealth v. McDermottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
3Cited by15 opinions
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
- Joyner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
- State v. KeithNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- Diego Gonzalez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1955
- People v. SchallerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.