State v. Pearce
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Tipton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
This is an appeal upon a point reserved by the state.
The defendant was tried upon an indictment for larceny. On the return of the verdict against the defendant, it was discovered that the entry of the return of the indictment by the grand jury, at a previous term of the Court, had been omitted; and thereupon the prosecuting attorney moved that the entry be then made nunc pro tunc. The defendant admitted the fact that ‘the indictment had been thus regularly returned, but objected to the nunc pro tunc entry, and moved on his part for a new trial, on account of the alleged defect in the record.
Th…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Wall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- Waterman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1888
- Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Gregory v. SlaughterIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.