A.R.M. v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
A.R.M. appeals his adjudication as a delinquent child for committing child molesting, as a Class C felony when committed by an adult, and battery, as a Class B misdemeanor when committed by an adult. A.R.M. presents a single issue on appeal, namely, whether the juvenile court admitted a videotape of an interview with the victim contrary to the provisions of Indiana Code Section 35-37-4-6, the Protected Person Statute (“PPS”). We hold that the juvenile court did not err when it determined that the child victim’s videotaped statement to a forensic…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kubsch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Myers v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Bowyer v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- M.T. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- David C. Ennik v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Anthony L. Gilliam v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Steven L. O'Bryant v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Wayne D. Kubsch v. Ron NealCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015