Legal Opinion

A.R.M. v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 2012No. 71A05-1111-JV-613PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

A.R.M. appeals his adjudication as a delinquent child for committing child molesting, as a Class C felony when committed by an adult, and battery, as a Class B misdemeanor when committed by an adult. A.R.M. presents a single issue on appeal, namely, whether the juvenile court admitted a videotape of an interview with the victim contrary to the provisions of Indiana Code Section 35-37-4-6, the Protected Person Statute (“PPS”). We hold that the juvenile court did not err when it determined that the child victim’s videotaped statement to a forensic…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kubsch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Myers v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Bowyer v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. M.T. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. David C. Ennik v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Anthony L. Gilliam v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Steven L. O'Bryant v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Wayne D. Kubsch v. Ron NealCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API